Court Rules Measure 37 Unfair, Unconstitutional, and Invalid


 
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Friends of Eugene Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kevin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Posts: 1154
Location: Eugene, Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:39 pm    Post subject: Court Rules Measure 37 Unfair, Unconstitutional, and Invalid Reply with quoteFind all posts by Kevin

Major Oregon news - 1000 Friends of Oregon press release:
http://www.friends.org/issues/press/M37/Circuit-Ruling-10-14-05.html

Court Rules Measure 37 Unfair, Unconstitutional, and Invalid

Today the Judge Mary James of the Marion Circuit Court ruled that Measure 37, adopted by voters in the election, is unconstitutional in the case of MacPherson v. Department of Administrative Services. Judge James concluded that the law is unconstitutional because it grants special privileges and immunities, impairs the legislative body's plenary power, suspends laws, and violates the separation of powers. In addition, Judge James ruled that the law violates substantive and procedural due process guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

The litigation was brought by 1000 Friends of Oregon, Senator Hector MacPherson (who was an original sponsor of SB100 in 1973) and other landowners and farmers. The State of Oregon defended the measure, as it is now state law. The plaintiffs had argued that Measure 37 was unconstitutional because the measure: (1) curtails the state's ability to protect the health and welfare of Oregonians, (2) grants privileges to a select class of landowners and (3) violates separation of powers by giving the legislature the authority to enforce the law, a power that is restricted to the executive branch of government.

"We are very pleased that the court recognized Measure 37 is not about fairness: it is unfair at its core. We expect local governments and the state to heed this ruling and not enforce the law," said Bob Stacey, Executive Director of 1000 Friends of Oregon. "We fully expected this case will go to the Supreme Court, so the fastest resolution of these issues is swift legislative action. Therefore, today we are calling on the Governor and legislative leaders to convene a special session and pass legislation that deals fairly with people who have borne an unfair burden-but not at the expense of their neighbors. We need compensation that makes landowners whole, not waivers that make them rich."

http://www.friends.org/issues/documents/M37/constitutional-challenge/M37-Opinion-Order-MSJ.pdf
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Friends of Eugene Forum Page 1 of 1

 




Latest Posts   ·   ArchWeek Jobs Board   ·   Classifieds   ·   User Galleries   ·   Scrapbook   ·   Open 3D Gallery
 Architecture Search   by name of Building, Architect, or Place:  
Buildings     Architects     Types & Styles     Places     Models     GB Image Index     ArchWeek Library
Professional Directory   Web Directory   Competitions   Conferences   Events & Exhibits     Products     Media Kit
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Free 3D   ·   Search
© 2004-2008 Artifice, Inc. · Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Thème myApple v2.0.1 créé par myTemplate