FUNCTIONALISM (DISSERTATION HELP!!!!!!!!)

[ecotectmaster]

From my previous essay where by I was discussing the different trends of Le Corbusier and Adolf Loos, I came across functionalism that aroused deep though and curiosity, within a theory that is widely open to debate, questions are of certainty. Such as does one design specifically to accommodate its function or should there be more concern with the visual decorative aspect? I first came across functionalism from reading the origin of functionalism theory, which I later tried to adapt to my individual design but with a lake of knowledge and little conviction I felt I didn’t prevail in the design. I was in constant battle with myself through the early stages of the design processes always questioning my decision. It’s these decision that interest me, how does one initiate design, functionalism works on the principle that architects should design a building based on the purpose of that building. Functionalism is a detachment from all historical and decorative elements believing that good design results from or is identical with functional efficiency. When designing for a client, is there a thin line between producing a fixed regulated layout and sculpturing decorative form? I plan to address the different views and theory behind the design process. Please could you post your own thoughts on this topic, and suggest some books that mite be relate to my dissertation
Thank you

[mx2]

Eco, you've managed to re-address a very popular subject here in DC; better known as the infamous and seemingless endless argument about "form follows function". Here in this forum we "concluded" that FFF was a part of the whole process of design. The biggest problem with this theory is in the semantics of certain terms used as some sort of template for designing. How does one determine what is "functional" or not, especially when discussing aesthetics? Does aesthetics have a function itself? Everyone has a different idea of how to apply this theory when designing, but ultimately I think we all agree that being informed of all the various theories and applying common sense to real-world projects basically includes (is required to) having given thought to the function of the spaces, building, and surrounding areas when making design decisions.

However, it is a personal choice, I feel, to make the determination that a design should be based solely upon functionalism. Many (famous) architects have tried and built and wrote about it but I would argue that these ideas did not become a standard for eternity and that should mean something. There is a difference between criticizing those who have pioneered new ideas and technologies in architecture then to propose new theories for improving architecture. I think it should be made clear that the theories of the past were tremendous contributions to the profession, however my opinion on your question in regards to a dissertation is to not simply replicate history but to apply some aspect of a theory in a new and valuable part opf our society today.

For example, I would begin to argue that pure fucntionalism moves design towards an isolationist stance that has contributed to the general disconnect of our cities and towns. Perhaps we could re-examine functionalism in a broader application and re-think our city or neighborhood planning. Or perhaps you introduce the antithesis to functionalism (art?) or propose a dualistic theory that encompasses really the latest trend...a marriage of modenistic/functionalism and traditional ornamentation that resonates more with the human psyche it appears...people like the "Mediterranean" homes but want the basic necessities as a precursor which compliments the economic aspect of building cheaply and affordably.

food for thought. good luck.

mx2.5

[ecotectmaster]

Thank you MX2 for your post, it has allowed me to start to think about other aspects of my discussion. I believe we should acknowledge the past theories that have been written by famous architects but with ambiguity. As time evolves, so does technology, requirements, regulations, life style etc that in turn has an effect on how things are done. I admire the great architects of the past and I am really interested in the theories but like you have stated, it needs to be address in a different light.

Thanks again

Ps I’ve been to Miami, was there last summer and loved it.

[ecotectmaster]

Can I get some more opinions please and some recommended books to read

Thanks

[universalarchitect]

REF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Formism
REF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_follows_function

Definitive Dimensions of Creative Architecture:
REF: GWDPhDUK at www.gwd-architecture.com